Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 1 (fast):
Content search 2:
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Dianetic Case Failures - B690417-2 | Сравнить
- Dianetic Case Supervision - B690417 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- КС-ание Дианетики (КС, ДИА) - Б690417R78 | Сравнить
- Провалы Дианетических Кейсов - Б690417-2 | Сравнить
CONTENTS DIANETIC CASE SUPERVISION Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 APRIL 1969
Issue II
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 17 APRIL 1969
RemimeoRemimeo
Qual SecsDianetics Chksht
Class VIIIsClass VIIIs
Dian AuditorsDianetic Auditors
Tech Secs

DIANETIC CASE SUPERVISION

Ds of T

Dianetics is done differently than Scientology in that its auditors are trained up to HDA only. Therefore they do not have various skills you will find in a Scientology Auditor. Even when they become a Scientology Auditor, Dianetics is still done as Dianetics.

Ds of P

Therefore the Case Supervisor supervising folders done by Dianetic Auditors must not expect or require any of the following:

DIANETIC CASE FAILURES

1. RUDIMENTS, they came in long after Dianetics.

The foremost failure of Dianetics on cases, by actual inspection, is a failure to do Dianetics.

2. MODEL SESSION, this was invented 11 years after Dianetics.

It may sound peculiar or too obvious to say that. But this fact has to be stressed since it was found to be the leading reason for non-recovery.

3. TRIPLE FLOWS.

Even this has its degrees of error.

4. WITHHOLDS PULLED.

1st is just NO auditing. A case wasn't audited at all. No session, no auditor, no auditing. Complaint, "I'm a Scientologist I still have awful headaches." Sounds real incriminating. The FACT is in this question "Did anybody run the engram?" "No, just grades."

5. PTPs handled (Present Time Problems).

Dianetics wasn't used at all.

6. ARC BREAKS patched up.

The next degree is starting in on a lock, secondary, engram or chain of them and not completing it to erasure. Running the pc through one engram once with no good Indicators or erasure and then calling it a session is really no auditing. Next session you must complete the action started.

In short knowledge and skill above and beyond the training received on a new Dianetics Course is not to be expected.

The next degree is to get rid of one chronic somatic or sensation and then fail to carry on when the pc has others too.

There are also things in Book One we no longer use such as Repeater Technique, looking for phrases to explain conditions.

The most recent discovery I made was that an illness has several sources expressed each one as a different sensation, ache, pain or emotion. EVERY ONE OF THESE IS OUT OF A MENTAL IMAGE PICTURE OR THE SERIES OF THEM CALLED A CHAIN.

We use Dianetics as it was re-worked in the early 60s and as currently being presented.

The degree of omission in applying Dianetics is that one did not take up each separately stated or assessed symptom and erase its source – that particular mental image picture.

If it isn't on the checksheet of the Dianetics Course, then we don't demand it.

The vast majority of Dianetic cases I have case supervised now have this in common – NO AUDITING in one or more instances outlined above.

We do demand some skill with a meter and what a floating needle is.

Really it's kind of "corny" as an error. It is so "corny" that people try to make more of it than simply the patient or engram didn't get audited.

If a Dianetic pc gets in trouble we send him to Qual for a review. In this review, all Scientology skills (but no grades) can be done.

"She still has her headaches."

In review he can get in his rudiments, etc.

"Did you find and audit the mental image picture of the experiences which had head injury in it?"

It is very worthy of note that in Reviewing Dianetics or in doing Dianetic auditing ONE CAN RUN OUT BAD SESSIONS AS AN AUDITOR OR PC BY USING R-3-R ON AUDITING SESSIONS OR THERAPY.

"No."

If we keep Dianetics to Dianetics we will again achieve the miracles of which it is capable.

"Well did you give her a session?"

Dianetics has been refined greatly. But it is all there on the checksheets now. There is no hidden data line.

"Yes."

It is far less complex today than it was in 1953, for instance, and much more effective. But it is still Dianetics. It is a technology that runs and erases locks, secondaries and engrams and their chains.

"What did you run?"

It should be case supervised and done with that fully in mind.

"I did Power on her."

An HDA is an HDA. He can do what he can do.

"Then you didn't give her a Dianetic session."

And it's marvellous.

"Oh, no. Dianetics is old, we don't do that anymore. She still has her headaches……"

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

POW!

LRH:jk.ei.rd
L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
LRH:jc.rd